- #SETTING UP A NAS FOR MAC WINDOWS 10#
- #SETTING UP A NAS FOR MAC PC#
- #SETTING UP A NAS FOR MAC PLUS#
- #SETTING UP A NAS FOR MAC FREE#
#SETTING UP A NAS FOR MAC FREE#
Free up a NAS and organize your remote storageīefore we get into my shared network drive tips, let’s start with the most basic question… Hopefully, in doing so, you can save your hair. I want to use my experience to help anyone out there who is thinking of going the NAS route. Overall, it was a great learning experience, but there were definitely some hair-pulling moments.
Once set up, I had a shared drive for all my devices. Honestly, Lightroom's technical restrictions aside (to coin a phrase) - you are just plain better off keeping your images close, and your catalog closer (to your computer).As someone with many Apple devices, I recently decided to take the plunge and consolidate my data on a local NAS server. Or a different UPS that might go down separately. When's the last time an IDE, SCSI, or SAS or SATA cable failed inside a computer, but you hear of external cables (and USB hubs) failing all the time.Īdd in you will often have a UPS or battery on your computer, but maybe not on your EHD/NAS. You get the idea.Īlso, "network" to many people means Wifi, subject to all sorts of issues of interference and capacity.Īlso, and I am sure with exceptions, external systems are just not as reliable in most cases. ooops, that wasn't the card reader, it was my EHD. When you have a drive outside the computer - NAS for sure, EHD also - it is extremely easy for the operator (which any statistic you check will show is the least reliable component) to accidentally disconnect it. To me there's one big difference, and it actually applies to the (permitted) use of EHD/USB drives - When you have an internal drive in your computer, absent hardware failure, the drive is up and available all the time the computer is available. And "network storage" can run over numerous protocols, some with lots of error checking and redundancy, some with very little. Almost all the protocols have varying degrees of redundancy and robustness. CIFS and SMB (both for accessing NAS data) are different from each other but are treating almost identically.
IDE is brain dead compared to SCSI in some ways. That's true of almost all storage, the underlying protocols are different.
Whilst you may have success in getting it to work, we would prefer that the actual technical details are not posted in an open forum post.not everyone has the same level of technical competence, so blindly trying to replicate what may be complex setup instructions could easily lead the less savvy user into catalog disaster, which we would rather not have happen. network-based catalogs are not supported, period. Since then, Adobe's position has, I believe, remained unchanged.i.e. However, one of the Adobe engineers (Dan Tull) did some experimentation in hoodwinking Lightroom into using a network-based catalog, and he reported that he consistently managed to irretrievably corrupt the catalog (and at the time he was the acknowledged expert in repairing corrupted catalogs). Of course there are ways around this restriction, and over the years some users have reported success. Attempting to open a catalog on a volume which Lightroom detects as being a network volume will fail, and the error message will explain why. What I know is that the Lightroom catalog uses SQlite, and that either LR or SQlite (or both) does not allow the catalog to be placed on a network volume. Are there other good technical reasons why it's not a good idea? I've read lots of arguments about network speed limitations being a reason to not have the catalog networked, but my network transfer speeds are significantly faster than even a local SATA SSD would be. My plan going forward is to keep photo folders and catalogs together in one place if possible and keep the catalog sizes relatively small.
#SETTING UP A NAS FOR MAC PC#
Rather than running my catalog on the local PC and having to back it and the backups up to the NAS, and then having the NAS sync the backup to the local storage/cloud, is there a really good reason why I couldn't/shouldn't run the catalog from the NAS on an iSCSI target volume? NAS is in the house for security reasons and the fact that it's FAR TOO LOUD to tolerate in my office.
#SETTING UP A NAS FOR MAC PLUS#
I have Cat 6 GbE for internet and the like, plus a dedicated 20,000 Mb/s link (2 x 10Gb-SR in LACP over fibre optic) to a Synology RS3617xs with 12 x 4 TB HDDs in RAID10.
#SETTING UP A NAS FOR MAC WINDOWS 10#
I've just upgraded my network and storage setup - I have a Windows 10 desktop PC in my office (dedicated concrete 'man-shed' in the back garden). OK, this has probably been asked before, but.